as a scientist-to-be, i am receiving training. a big part of becoming a scientist is the ability to come up with ideas and hypotheses to explore the unknowns. well, i did come up with something and with great enthusiam i was dying to test my hypothesis and to dig deeper into the matter at hands.
as everyone knows there are many sides to one story, and there are many layers to the very same story. and one story is often times connected to another if you get your hands on the right piece for connection. excitingly i found many possible linkages just by reading the available literature. i want to run the experiments to see whether i was anywhere close to what i thought. of course what i thought had no preliminary data because i just thought of the possible connection.
the dilemma now is without preliminary data to support my hypothesis, i can't even run the experiment. or i should say my PI doesn't buy it, but he's proposing as well something that had no preliminary data of. here i don't know exactly why my proposal dropped dead. i saw great potential and value, but sadly they didn't.
how can i, the little one who is getting trained, with no preliminary data at hands make them see what i see? i read, but they didn't read what i read, how can i tell them the great importance of what i want to test if they don't see it when i tell them.
i can't help but to think that they don't approve of my proposal because it's not in their realm of expertise. and if i were to get their guidance, they'd better be in control of the whole experiment. should i quit and just go with their "command"? or should i persue and persuade them further? no, there's no sign of success as they have already changed my path.
but my idea must not die. in case i have no opportunity to test it ever, at least it should live here. i believe that during viral infection and the like, the deviated brain immune system is activated. unlike the rest of the body, the brain has much more signal trasducing agents, neurotransmitters, peptides, soluble gas and amino acids on top of cytokines and chemokines. brain cell death must be far more regulated than cells in the rest of the body because they don't divide. for events such highly regulated, there's much to be known and that's what i want to know. i hope somebody will look into it and let me know what they find. i want to know under what trigger and mechanism our brain cells die. or if they don't die, through what process they become dysfunctional, like those of progressive neurological diseases.
well, this is probably not the only time when i will not be able to follow my heart. but at least i must learn this is not an end, just like how i slowly but surely live my dreams, one by one and one at a time.
yet i also know at times, what i want may not be best for me. things always happen for a reason and there are things to be learned in each and every happening.